Should the Profession abandon its search for the G-spot? Aptitude Tests (Again)

Research published by the Legal Services Board by Chris Dewberry brings into sharper relief the value of aptitude tests and their application to the legal professions. For me it suggests that the value of aptitude tests is most likely to be felt at the entry into University stage (and possibly not there) but that ensuring … Continue reading Should the Profession abandon its search for the G-spot? Aptitude Tests (Again)

Aptitude Tests Research Reveals there are Better Alternatives?

A report to the Law Society claims that LPC aptitude tests offer a "number of benefits".  That claim is not looking very strong according to a report of the research report they have commissioned. As I can't get access to the report yet [footnote: the report link is now working thanks to some speedy work … Continue reading Aptitude Tests Research Reveals there are Better Alternatives?

Aptitude Tests: when will they have worked?

I remain agnostic about aptitude tests. If they truly are good indicators of aptitude, and if they can encourage greater diversity in the profession, then there is significant merit in them especially if they inform decisions by chambers (which will be the real practical test of their ultimate success). There are, however, significant, but not … Continue reading Aptitude Tests: when will they have worked?

Aptitude tests: right idea, wrong time?

It appears the Law Society are playing catch up with the Bar Standards Board and considering an aptitude test for entrants into the Legal Practice Course (Legal Futures reports). The primary aim appears to be to tackle the mismatch between those studying the LPC and those getting training contacts. Legalfutures reports this as a scandal, … Continue reading Aptitude tests: right idea, wrong time?