Do salaries indicate the Law Society’s priorities?

There’s an interesting story on the Legal Futures website.  It states that, ” Law Society chief executive Des Hudson received pay, benefits and pension contributions of £334,895 in 2009 (£304,849 in 2008), Solicitors Regulation Authority chief executive Antony Townsend £224,051 (£205,445 in 2008) and LCS chief executive Deborah Evans £196,620 (£160,821 in 2008).”  Is this an sign of what the profession views as most important?   In particular, does representation trump regulation?

They are handsome salaries of course (and exceed the Prime Minister’s salary under the – unhappily – vogue test being used by the nation’s press) but one wonders why the CEO job is better remunerated than the SRA job, particularly as my guess is it would draw candidates from similar pools.  Indeed, if asked which is the easier job: regulating or representing the profession, I know which I’d pick (and that’s not to say that Des Hudson – who does sterling work for the profession – has an easy ride).


About Richard Moorhead

Director of the Centre for Ethics and Law and Professor of Law and Professional Ethics at the Faculty of Laws, University College London with an interest in teaching and research on the legal ethics, the professions, legal aid, access to justice and the courts.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Do salaries indicate the Law Society’s priorities?

  1. John Flood says:

    And his salary is a lot less than that of Nigel Savage at the College of Law–over £400,000.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s